Furnace Binaries are now available

<p>Hey folks. </p> <p>So, I thought that maybe people don&#39;t want to get the source and compile stuff, but rather want a ready to use binary for each operating system. So I put a quick (ugly) website where you can download pre-compiled binaries for each operating system with a MD5 digest for verification. </p> <p><a href="https://skarlso.github.io/furnace-web/" rel="nofollow">Furnace WebSite</a>. </p> <p><a href="https://github.com/Skarlso/go-furnace" rel="nofollow">Furnace</a> is a website hosting solution written in go using CodeDeploy and CloudFormation stacks on AWS.<br/> Cheers!</p> <hr/>**评论：**<br/><br/>shark1337: <pre><p>Looks good, nice!!</p></pre>skarlso: <pre><p>Thanks very much!! :-) Appreciate it!</p></pre>foofoo200: <pre><p>Or sha256 which is not that old as sha1?</p></pre>dchapes: <pre><blockquote> <p>with a MD5 digest for verification</p> </blockquote> <p>Why would anyone still use <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MD5#Security" rel="nofollow">MD5</a> for something like this when far superior and non-broken hashes exist?</p> <p>For something like this you should be using a secure digital signature (e.g. an OpenPGP signed executable, or for MS Windows or Mac a signed executable that the OS recognises). [See Wikipedia&#39;s <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_signing" rel="nofollow">Code signing</a> entry.]</p></pre>skarlso: <pre><p>Because I&#39;m not signing code I&#39;m just verifying a downloaded file. It&#39;s simple, easy, fast and anyone can use it. :-)</p></pre>dchapes: <pre><p>Can anyone not equally use a SHA1 hash? That would be much more secure than MD5.</p></pre>