<p>I'm very curious to learn which Go packages you feel have well-designed APIs that:</p>
<ul>
<li>Are pleasing or intuitive to use</li>
<li>Accurately model the domain within Go's type system</li>
</ul>
<p>And among these, if you were to design the API from scratch, what would you change?</p>
<p>If possible, and to the extent that it's possible, I'd like to leave out documentation quality as a factor.</p>
这是一个分享于 的资源,其中的信息可能已经有所发展或是发生改变。
入群交流(和以上内容无关):加入Go大咖交流群,或添加微信:liuxiaoyan-s 备注:入群;或加QQ群:692541889
- 请尽量让自己的回复能够对别人有帮助
- 支持 Markdown 格式, **粗体**、~~删除线~~、
`单行代码`
- 支持 @ 本站用户;支持表情(输入 : 提示),见 Emoji cheat sheet
- 图片支持拖拽、截图粘贴等方式上传