<p>As you may know, Lockheed Martin became the first client for DWave quantum computing system. It is only a matter of time before its ubiquitous in corporate world.</p>
<p>Current asymmetric cryptography like RSA is vulnerable to quantum computing, hence the alternative <a href="https://github.com/tbuktu/ntru">NTRU</a>. </p>
<p>Is there any effort in Go community to bring NTRU to life? There is <a href="https://github.com/Yawning/ntru">one dead/inactive project.</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<hr/>**评论:**<br/><br/>tv64738: <pre><p>Just say no to any patented algorithms.</p></pre>balloonanimalfarm: <pre><p>I wouldn't worry too much about DWave's quantum "computers". Their domain of problems is only annealing and they can't perform the traditional operations that a computer can, so until a major breakthrough is had in the field they won't be breaking RSA anytime soon.</p></pre>Jalaska13: <pre><p>True, although they are a proof of concept of the underlying principles, which means it's "only a matter of time" before crypanalytic-capable quantum computers are feasible. Of course, "only a matter of time" could mean 20 years, but standardized protocols move very slowly, so we need to have a battle-tested quantum-safe public key cryptographic algorithm long before that, and preferably some standards as well (a la PKCS and friends). If a cryptanalytic-capable quantum computer is built before that's been done, even at the undoubtedly break-neck pace that a solution will be developed after such a computer is made public, it will still be months to years before it's ready, and that entire time will be a field day for whoever has access to such a computer.</p></pre>besna: <pre><p>NTRU forces GPL, which is a nogo.</p></pre>
这是一个分享于 的资源,其中的信息可能已经有所发展或是发生改变。
入群交流(和以上内容无关):加入Go大咖交流群,或添加微信:liuxiaoyan-s 备注:入群;或加QQ群:692541889
- 请尽量让自己的回复能够对别人有帮助
- 支持 Markdown 格式, **粗体**、~~删除线~~、
`单行代码`
- 支持 @ 本站用户;支持表情(输入 : 提示),见 Emoji cheat sheet
- 图片支持拖拽、截图粘贴等方式上传