<p>as titled, I am planning to build a RESTful API server with mongodb, and saw echo (<a href="https://github.com/labstack/echo" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/labstack/echo</a>) has great performance. question is really how good is the framework to play with mongo and is it well-maintained?</p>
<p>or any other suggestions?</p>
<p>Cheers.</p>
<hr/>**评论:**<br/><br/>skarlso: <pre><p>I'm using <a href="https://github.com/gin-gonic/gin" rel="nofollow">Gin</a>, and I'm very happy with it. Performance is awesome. Logging, error handling, middleware is awesome, and basically anything what you would need, like logging and panic handling, is already in it. It's a breeze to setup, and it basically takes care of all the JSON parsing between requests and responses. And it's still small enough to be not in your way; also groupping API versions is f*king gorgeous. And compared to echo, it is much more mature.</opinion></p></pre>skidooer: <pre><blockquote>
<p>or any other suggestions?</p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="https://golang.org/pkg/net/http/" rel="nofollow">net/http</a></p>
<p>Especially if you don't already know exactly what you plan to gain from using a given framework.</p></pre>mgutz: <pre><p>I see a lot of people recommend Gin. Gin's router is finicky and often have to resort to unintuitive paths. We moved to echo because of it.</p></pre>ecmdome: <pre><p>It all depends on your comfort and knowledge of what goes into a framework.</p>
<p>Go is very modular which allows you to kind of piece together tour own framework.</p>
<p>Some of my favorite packages to help this task along are <a href="https://github.com/codegangsta/negroni" rel="nofollow">Negroni</a> and various packages from the <a href="http://www.gorillatoolkit.org" rel="nofollow">Gorilla Toolkit</a>, primarily the mux and session packages </p>
<p>edit: updated broken gorilla toolkit link</p></pre>dlsniper: <pre><p>Gorilla Toolkit for me as well.</p>
<p>If you get to the point where performance of your router prevents your code from scaling then you should look into others.</p></pre>1Gijs: <pre><p>I hear Gin mentioned regularly by devs much more seasoned then me. I used Echo in my current project but plan to use Gin next.</p></pre>CaptaincCodeman: <pre><p>I've tried a few frameworks and settled on echo. It's worked well and I've had no problems with it. The performance is great and the devs are responsive to any issues or suggestions.</p>
<p>Many of the micro-frameworks are fairly similar though and if you architect your solution well then it's fairly easy to switch between them - the framework really just handles routing plus parsing params / serializing responses. The guts of your app shouldn't really have to know too much about the web framework (or the persistence) so those things can be swapped out.</p></pre>ahmetlutfu: <pre><p>try beego. <a href="http://beego.me/docs/intro/" rel="nofollow">http://beego.me/docs/intro/</a></p></pre>genxstylez: <pre><p>What's rhe performance comparison between gin and echo?</p></pre>skarlso: <pre><p>It's right there on their github page. ;) With big letters saying: <strong>Performance</strong>. They are even underneath each other.</p>
<pre><code>BenchmarkEcho_GithubAll 30000 38662 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op
BenchmarkGin_GithubAll 30000 43467 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op
</code></pre></pre>genxstylez: <pre><p>I know, but I just wana double check, haha.</p></pre>
这是一个分享于 的资源,其中的信息可能已经有所发展或是发生改变。
入群交流(和以上内容无关):加入Go大咖交流群,或添加微信:liuxiaoyan-s 备注:入群;或加QQ群:692541889
- 请尽量让自己的回复能够对别人有帮助
- 支持 Markdown 格式, **粗体**、~~删除线~~、
`单行代码`
- 支持 @ 本站用户;支持表情(输入 : 提示),见 Emoji cheat sheet
- 图片支持拖拽、截图粘贴等方式上传