<p>Is this 2012 book too old to learn from?</p>
<hr/>**评论:**<br/><br/>weberc2: <pre><p>I don't know the book, but as a language, Go has not changed significantly. That said, the ecosystem (packages, toolchain, best practices, etc) have evolved a lot.</p></pre>natefinch: <pre><p>I have the book. It should be totally valid. Very little has changed, aside from some additions to the toolchain. Certainly it's totally valid for learning the language, just some recent toolchain additions won't be mentioned (like go generate etc). But those are no where near critical to a newbie.</p></pre>
这是一个分享于 的资源,其中的信息可能已经有所发展或是发生改变。
入群交流(和以上内容无关):加入Go大咖交流群,或添加微信:liuxiaoyan-s 备注:入群;或加QQ群:692541889
0 回复
- 请尽量让自己的回复能够对别人有帮助
- 支持 Markdown 格式, **粗体**、~~删除线~~、
`单行代码`
- 支持 @ 本站用户;支持表情(输入 : 提示),见 Emoji cheat sheet
- 图片支持拖拽、截图粘贴等方式上传