<p>Before:</p>
<pre><code>package main
import (
"net/http"
"github.com/gin-gonic/gin"
)
var r *gin.Engine
func handle(ctx *gin.Context) {
ctx.String(http.StatusOK, "Hello, %s!", ctx.Param("name"))
}
func init() {
r = gin.Default()
r.GET("/hello/:name", handle)
}
func main() {
r.Run(":8080")
}
</code></pre>
<p>After:</p>
<pre><code>package main
import (
"net/http"
"github.com/eawsy/aws-lambda-go-net/service/lambda/runtime/net"
"github.com/gin-gonic/gin"
)
var r *gin.Engine
func handle(ctx *gin.Context) {
ctx.String(http.StatusOK, "Hello, %s!", ctx.Param("name"))
}
func init() {
r = gin.Default()
r.GET("/hello/:name", handle)
go http.Serve(net.Listener(), r)
}
func main() {
}
</code></pre>
<p>Spot the difference :)</p>
<p><a href="https://github.com/eawsy/aws-lambda-go-net" rel="nofollow">BTW</a> </p>
<hr/>**评论：**<br/><br/>danilobuerger: <pre><p>Ugh, Iris.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/57w79c/why_you_really_should_stop_using_iris/" rel="nofollow">https://www.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/57w79c/why_you_really_should_stop_using_iris/</a>
<a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/57tmp1/why_you_should_not_use_iris_for_your_go_projects/" rel="nofollow">https://www.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/57tmp1/why_you_should_not_use_iris_for_your_go_projects/</a></p></pre>lsuss: <pre><p>The example is about Gin. But this post isn't about Iris or wathever, it's about a way to run <strong>any</strong> HTTP Golang web framework on AWS Lambda (which is awesome, you agree :p).</p></pre>hipone: <pre><p>The framework in question is mentioned in the title and put alongside other Go frameworks. The point here might be that this framework should not be considered "equal" to other frameworks, as there's some fishy history behind it.</p></pre>fsenart: <pre><p>Actually, it is equal to "whatever else" :) No seriously I understand the problem behind Iris but what I want to say through this post and the associated project is about how to migrate existing apps to AWS Lambda. Also, my goal was not to debate around the "correctness" or the "behavior" of a "creepy" open source developer. </p></pre>danilobuerger: <pre><p>Featuring him in the README will lead some people to consider it a good framework by association (same as some do, by the amount of stars he botted). That in turn, will lead to people (especially newcomers to the language) wasting time on it. There are enough good web frameworks out there that you could have used in the README instead to show of that it works with any.</p></pre>fsenart: <pre><p>Wait for it...</p>
<p>Iris is no more in the README :)</p></pre>lsuss: <pre><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NNAuJqV-n9g" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NNAuJqV-n9g</a></p></pre>youtubefactsbot: <pre><blockquote>
<p><a href="http://youtu.be/NNAuJqV-n9g" rel="nofollow"><strong>Bomb has been defused - CS:GO Sound Effect [0:02]</strong></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQn7QtrjtLpMdSNLBf8iStg" rel="nofollow"><em><sup>Sound</sup> <sup>Effects</sup> <sup>&</sup> <sup>Templates</sup></em></a> <sup>in</sup> <sup>Howto</sup> <sup>&</sup> <sup>Style</sup></p>
<p><em><sup>130,652</sup> <sup>views</sup> <sup>since</sup> <sup>Apr</sup> <sup>2015</sup></em></p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/youtubefactsbot/wiki/index" rel="nofollow"><sup>bot</sup> <sup>info</sup></a></p></pre>danilobuerger: <pre><p>Nice!</p></pre>
