GoConvey / Ginkgo

polaris · · 838 次点击    
这是一个分享于 的资源,其中的信息可能已经有所发展或是发生改变。
<p>Is there any value of using one over the other (besides the WebUI) ?</p> <p>I am asking since I have started with BDD in Golang and I cannot understand the differences of those packages. Describing features are rendered differently (Ginkgo: var _ = Describe(), GoConvey: func Test {Convey()...}) but in the end they are the exact same thing. So is there any valuable reason to use (or not use) one or the other or is it mere preference whether you like Ginkgos or Conveys syntax more?</p> <hr/>**评论:**<br/><br/>mwholt: <pre><p>Style preference. I don&#39;t know much reason to use one over the other as far as a BDD framework goes. That said, I use GoConvey&#39;s web UI (I also built it, but that&#39;s beside the point), because it&#39;s a real nice way to just keep getting updated on the test results. It also makes me feel cool when I fullscreen it up on a second monitor and people walk by. :P</p></pre>j_d_q: <pre><p>I use ginkgo but don&#39;t have a solid argument for one over the other. Both are good choices for BDD </p></pre>

入群交流(和以上内容无关):加入Go大咖交流群,或添加微信:liuxiaoyan-s 备注:入群;或加QQ群:692541889

838 次点击  
加入收藏 微博
0 回复
暂无回复
添加一条新回复 (您需要 登录 后才能回复 没有账号 ?)
  • 请尽量让自己的回复能够对别人有帮助
  • 支持 Markdown 格式, **粗体**、~~删除线~~、`单行代码`
  • 支持 @ 本站用户;支持表情(输入 : 提示),见 Emoji cheat sheet
  • 图片支持拖拽、截图粘贴等方式上传