<hr/>**评论：**<br/><br/>Jevin1983: <pre><p>The Mask 2, son of mask.</p></pre>Captain_Kuhl: <pre><p>That movie made me legitimately mad when I saw it for the first time. The Mask was so damn good, and then they make <em>that</em>? It's like they ripped off their own leg to step that far backwards. </p></pre>ElsaKopp: <pre><p>My whole family fell asleep about halfway through it, but I stayed up and watched the entire thing. Still salty about it.</p></pre>ScorchingBullet: <pre><p>Fantastic 4 (2015)</p>
<p>Oh my fuck, that was <strong>really</strong> bad.</p></pre>MouthOfTheGiftHorse: <pre><p>Fant4stic?</p></pre>ShagadelicMojo: <pre><p>You know it's a bad movie when they replace an 'a' in the title with '4' simply because: dats wat kidz do.</p></pre>heartbeats: <pre><p>|= 4 |\| + 4 5 7 1 (</p></pre>DootClass: <pre><p>I believe that reading this is what a strokes feel like</p></pre>Deagballs: <pre><p>Yes it was bad, but I did appreciate the scene where DOOM is shredding up lab workers and guards with his telepathic abilities. It was pretty cool. But everything was lame.</p></pre>Um5acentric: <pre><p>It was clearly two different visions smashed together in a pile of shit.</p>
<p>The scene with DOOM literally walking down the hall and murdering people with no remorse, Human Torch lying in agony and burning up... To me it clearly looked like Josh Trank was going for a super-morbid, dark story but then they skipped 2 years and had a super boring Power Rangers style final fight. </p></pre>AnAcceptableUserName: <pre><p>S. Darko</p>
<p>Donnie Darko was great. S. Darko should have been smashed by a falling jet engine before anybody could watch it.</p></pre>PMMEYOURCOMPLIMENTS: <pre><p>oh god, S Darko is the definition of a sequel nobody was asking for that was worse than anything anyone could predict.</p>
<p>I mean it's not even regular shitty, like The last airbender-shitty.</p>
<p>It's shit that's eaten by a bunch of pigs, who were turned into burgers, those burgers were left out to become extra moldy, eaten up by other pigs and pooped out again. It's an abomination that should be illegal to make. Even just thinking about that movie
makes me so angry I want to lobotomize myself so I don't have any memory of that piece of unholy devil shit</p></pre>PityUpvote: <pre><blockquote>
<p>I want to lobotomize myself so I don't have any memory of that piece of unholy devil shit</p>
</blockquote>
<p>But then you might accidentally watch it again.</p></pre>LX_Emergency: <pre><p>Wait...is that a sequel?</p></pre>dosh75: <pre><p>Forget about this and continue with your life.
Trust me in this one</p></pre>LX_Emergency: <pre><p>No worries.</p></pre>lurklurklurkPOST: <pre><p>Gigli is so bad it never even makes it to these threads.</p></pre>Copper_Coil: <pre><p>What are you talking about? This movie needed to be made to end the Affleck Jlo relationship. You can watch the funeral for it in Jersey Girl.</p></pre>DirtySingh: <pre><p>I always bring this movie up. Can't let people forget. </p></pre>EhrmagerdiusTheGreat: <pre><blockquote>
<p>Gigli</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Box office: 7.3 million USD
Budget: 54 million USD</p>
<p>Someone won't forget.</p></pre>Nobody_epic: <pre><p>Food fight - for those that don't know this film was supposed to be a sort of reck it Ralph type film but instead of video game characters they would instead have big name supermarket brands in there. But there's hardly any even in there and when there are it's terrible. </p>
<p>This film was in production hell with the amount of time that it took to make. They have such big name celebrities in that film it's absolutely crazy. They have Charlie sheen and Christopher Lloyd (with the most insane animation ever made) </p>
<p>The CGI looks like they forgot to render it and the plot makes no sense at all. </p>
<p>This film took hundreds of millions to make and I honestly think if you have me a day and a book on how to use blender I would be able to make something better if I was blindfolded whilst making it. </p>
<p>Seriously this movie is so bad in every way possible I suggest you check it out because how it was released like that is a fucking enigma. </p>
<p>Edit : 10s of millions not hundreds thanks everyone. </p></pre>topdawg312: <pre><p>im pretty sure that movie was just a money laundering scheme</p></pre>TheShtuff: <pre><p>It had to be. There's no way movie footage on a multi million dollar movie just has one copy that's "stolen" or got "deleted." It's got money laundering written all over it. </p></pre>eleventwentyfourteen: <pre><blockquote>
<p>There's no way movie footage on a multi million dollar movie just has one copy that's "stolen" or got "deleted."</p>
</blockquote>
<p>To be fair, this almost happened to Toy Story.</p></pre>OneFinalEffort: <pre><p>Toy Story 2 actually. If someone hadn't had a backup at home, the movie would have died. It was also a blessing in disguise because the original script was garbage and this mishap shifted their gears into overdrive to make the best movie before anything else could happen.</p></pre>PhysicsFornicator: <pre><p>All thanks to that one employee who got pregnant and was working from home with a copy of the movie. Their child will be able to tell people that they saved a beloved Pixar film by merely existing.</p></pre>Desert_Unicorn: <pre><p>I had never heard of it so I looked it up on IMDb. One of the reviews:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Even Chuck Norris' tears can't cure this grotesque cancer. I'd gladly give this 0 out of 10 if I could</p>
</blockquote>
<p>It currently has a 1.7 rating</p></pre>_Bumble_Bee_Tuna_: <pre><p>Ive never heard of it. How old is it? </p></pre>pa79: <pre><p>Read the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foodfight!">Wikipedia entry for FoodFight!</a> At one time, the producers claimed that early renders of the movie had been "stolen" and they had to start from scratch.</p></pre>ChristopherClarkKent: <pre><p>Budget$45 million[3]</p>
<p>Box office$73,706[1]</p>
<p>OK, that's hilarious</p></pre>MisterSaggyMoobs: <pre><p>I only watched it when JonTron watched it</p>
<p>Shit Squirrel still haunts me...</p></pre>ThorOfKenya2: <pre><p>Is...Is that a poop rat?</p></pre>Phantomazing: <pre><p>ＡＭ Ｉ ＤＥＡＤ ＹＥＴ</p></pre>Lord_Boro: <pre><p>Dragonball Evolution</p></pre>shlam16: <pre><p>That movie was one of the single most <strong>important</strong> things to happen to the Dragon Ball franchise. It is the direct reason that Dragon Ball has been revived today and is running a fresh (and awesome) new series called Dragon Ball Super.</p>
<p>That movie left such a bad taste in the mouth of the creator that he agreed to come back for a one time movie called Battle of Gods. This was incredibly successful and spawned a sequel called Resurrection of F(rieza). This was also incredibly successful and spawned the new series which readapted those two movies and continued along their canon. 92 episodes later and it's got no end in sight.</p></pre>robotlaw: <pre><p>People bring up the new movies but they never bring up the best piece of Dragon Ball media in years, Jaco the Galactic Patrolman.</p></pre>PapaBlessDotCom: <pre><p>Technically he's out of his jurisdiction. </p></pre>kfijatass: <pre><p>To be fair if not for it we woulnt've gotten Dragon Ball Super.</p></pre>Just_Drink: <pre><p>Can you explain this more?</p></pre>kfijatass: <pre><p>Allegedly Akira Toriyama saw the disaster of a movie and its shitness inspired him to continue the series.</p></pre>LeilaniLad: <pre><p>In Godzilla, Mothra and King Ghidorah: Giant Monsters All-Out Attack (made in 2001):</p>
<p>One radar operator says to another, "Didn't Godzilla attack America a couple years back?". </p>
<p>The other one replies, "...that wasn't Godzilla."</p></pre>Sceptile90: <pre><p>Plus the whole Godzilla VS Zilla thing that lasts about ten seconds in Final Wars.</p></pre>Baba_dook_dook_dook: <pre><p>Seriously. A space ship drops Zilla down onto the city, who then charges at Godzilla and is immediately tail smacked into a building that looks like the Sydney Opera House, and is then completely blown away with atomic fire breath. This all happens while the intro to All To Blame by Sum 41 plays in the background. It's actually kind of epic and hilarious at the same time.</p>
<p>Edit: This is the scene: <a href="https://youtu.be/zPxhdo4HDgg">https://youtu.be/zPxhdo4HDgg</a></p></pre>RobotN0ises: <pre><p>The Butterfly Effect 2</p></pre>Jakeweber22: <pre><p>Have you seen 3? </p></pre>TheShlong: <pre><p>There are 3 of those?</p></pre>MeganAmelie36: <pre><p>The Emoji Movie</p></pre>Flexible_Perplexity: <pre><p><em>"Maybe I'm meant to have more than one emotion!"</em></p>
<p>How fucking inspiring...</p></pre>markymarkfro: <pre><p>Imagine being an animator for that movie</p>
<p>Wonder how it feels having to go into work knowing you're animating literal and figurative shit</p></pre>Last_Gallifreyan: <pre><p>Then you realize that it could always be worse as <strong>Sir Patrick Stewart</strong> is the voice of said literal shit.</p></pre>Safari_Mossly: <pre><p>What have i become, my sweetest freind. Everyone I know, goes away, in the end.</p></pre>SupaKoopa714: <pre><p>The irony is that movie only makes me feel one emotion: disgust. </p></pre>Casual_Reggae: <pre><p>Isn't that the plot of Inside Out?</p></pre>Kadexe: <pre><p>This movie copies a lot of plot points, themes, characters, and jokes from Inside Out, Wreck-It Ralph, and The Lego Movie. You should look up the video "You've already seen the Emoji Movie" on YouTube.</p></pre>WaterStoryMark: <pre><p>Part of it, but Inside.Out presented a lot of ideas. With subtlety and an understanding of humanity. I don't see this one taking the same route.</p></pre>redflcn: <pre><p>Seriously. A lot of thought and research was put in Inside Out. One of the most creative movies of 2015.</p>
<p>Emoji Movie? Not even close.</p></pre>kerred: <pre><p>Remember, instead of a Genndy Taratofsky (Samurai Jack and others) movie of Popeye, we got an emoji movie.</p></pre>Voideddesert: <pre><p>Even my father who <em>hates</em> 3D animation thought Popeye looked awesome. Now we're getting literal shit. </p></pre>Beecakeband: <pre><p>That's a thing? Seriously? Fucks sake it's like they're not even trying </p></pre>kfijatass: <pre><p>So is everything angry birds or minions but there you go, shit sells.</p></pre>sopheroo: <pre><p>The Angry Birds game has a plot, if even a simple one.</p>
<p>Making a movie about it is a cash grab, but there was something to work around, and it was decent. Not BEST MOVIE GIVE THAT AN OSCAR, but decent. </p>
<p>The plot of the minion movie was also okay. Minions themselves are annoying, but the plot was alright. Sadly, it didn't redeem minions because they're still annoying one-note characters. </p>
<p>What kind of plot can you make with EMOJIS?</p></pre>kfijatass: <pre><p>You can make it of a similar note as Inside Out ; I just despise cheapass franchises cashing in on every media.</p></pre>sopheroo: <pre><p>Great idea, actually. I would have liked it, had it has come out before Inside Out.</p>
<p>The timing of the Emoji movie was poor. Your suggestion would have been interesting before Inside Out?</p>
<p>Now...what we have...it just looks like a knockoff of every underdog movie ever</p></pre>0598: <pre><p>Jacksfilms got me excited for it</p></pre>robdestrob: <pre><p>I wonder if his ironic enjoyment for the trailers and whatnot has become unironic at this point.</p></pre>TheBaconBoots: <pre><p>He's a human shitpost. I think he's just gone mad.</p></pre>PineappleHour: <pre><p>He streamed himself verbally counting down to the movie, spinning fidget spinners, and dabbing every minute yesterday. For an hour. Dude is losing it.</p></pre>ThatNordicGuy: <pre><p>He's about the take on his final form!</p></pre>Scofield442: <pre><p>After Earth.</p>
<p>It felt like Will Smith was trying to shoe horn his son into super stardom instead of just letting his talent speak for itself.</p>
<p>Based on that movie, he doesn't have the talent Will was hoping for.</p>
<p>A lifeless performance from the both of them. </p></pre>LaPiscinaDeLaMuerte: <pre><p>Honestly, the concept of the movie was pretty awesome. If Will Smith had just kept Jaden out of it and Will played all of Jaden's role, it would have been pretty awesome.</p></pre>Scofield442: <pre><p>I absolutely loved the concept. It seemed like my sort of movie from the get go. </p>
<p>However, in the trailer, they failed to mention Will Smith's character doesn't have any emotions. He fights without fear - which just created a hugely boring character. </p></pre>LaPiscinaDeLaMuerte: <pre><p>True, but I think they could have made it to where the government or whatever at the time make it so all warriors posses that trait but Will Smith somehow was able to fake it and actually experiences fear or something. Either way, it would have been much better without Jaden.</p></pre>Scofield442: <pre><p>It just would have been better if they both tackled earth head on together, instead of Will Smith sitting in the ship the whole movie, telling Jaden what to do. </p>
<p>I was so disappointed when I realised this movie was just about Jaden, and not the pair of them.</p></pre>ImHully: <pre><p>Cat Woman.</p></pre>Nobody_epic: <pre><p>The basketball scene...</p></pre>LethalPirate: <pre><p>Holy Shit! I just rewatched the scene and besides the weird sexual tension in front of 30 kids, the jumping every half second, and the weird camera lenses, it's absolutely the best Capri Sun commercial ever. </p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rNlmRId2FVQ">Source</a> for those interested. </p></pre>bignasty501: <pre><p>That is without a doubt the stupidest shit I have ever seen.</p></pre>Bald_Sasquach: <pre><p>My EYYYEEEESSSS</p></pre>dalbtraps: <pre><p>Not to mention why tf would a bunch of kids give up their court and basketball to watch two adults play 1 on 1?</p></pre>anvilchandelier: <pre><p>137 camera cuts in a minute and 44 seconds, INSANE</p></pre>EccentricBolt: <pre><p>Alright rainman. I'll just take your word for it. <sup>Because</sup> <sup>there</sup> <sup>is</sup> <sup>now</sup> <sup>way</sup> <sup>I'm</sup> <sup>watching</sup> <sup>that</sup> <sup>again.</sup></p></pre>Bona_Fried: <pre><p><a href="https://youtu.be/rNlmRId2FVQ">Here</a> is in all its glory</p></pre>vidarino: <pre><p>Jesus, it's worse than I remembered. What the fuck were the editors even thinking!?</p></pre>GazzP: <pre><p>Probably trying to disguise the fact that neither actor had even the slightest amount of basketball skill.</p></pre>lilahking: <pre><p>he was playing ok ball in dr strange </p></pre>Dominus-Temporis: <pre><p>He saw the end product in Cat Woman and vowed "never again" so he picked up some skills. </p></pre>SippantheSwede: <pre><p>"Maybe if we make enough fast cuts back and forth, nobody will notice that this scene is painful."</p></pre>istara: <pre><p>It's the kids having to stand around pretending they think it's cool and entertaining to watch two weird adults doing a lame dance and getting it on with each other. </p></pre>Driesens: <pre><p>Probably "Oh God, what was director thinking when he shot this. Now I've got to try to salvage this footage into something managea- oh no here he comes let me leave no for the love of God don't make me do this"</p></pre>laststandman: <pre><p>That's legitimately nauseating.</p></pre>cake_for_breakfast76: <pre><p>Jesus tapdancing Christ. I've never seen the movie, and I actually can't believe how bad that was. Wow, just, wow.</p></pre>Shoutcake: <pre><p>What the fuck? This reminds me of something Jackie Chan said about people using cuts and camera angles to make shitty action scenes look better. They tried so hard to make it look like they were playing really good basketball but they were shit lol</p></pre>Ua_Tsaug: <pre><p>Is this what it feels like to have a seizure?</p></pre>CDThroaway1111: <pre><p>I'm epileptic. Seizures are much more painless, I just black out.</p></pre>very_cool_stuff: <pre><p>That scene jumped so much it should have a seizure warning attached to it</p></pre>swheels125: <pre><p>I've had a debate with my friends over what the worst comic to movie adaptation has been so far. People argued pretty heavily for green lantern or one of the Wolverine prequels but Catwoman will always take the crown for me. Because at the end of the day they used A COMPLETELY DIFFERENT PERSON/CHARACTER. Catwoman that we all know from the Batman comics/movies is a woman named Selina Kyle who is an incredibly skilled thief. The movie follows mousy assistant Patience Insertlastnamehere from being the frizzy haired assistant to the acrobatic and actually super powered Catwoman who is basically Spider-Man but with cat powers. I don't get it. There's decades of catwoman comics and they threw it all away to make a garbage movie about a garbage version of an actually pretty cool character. </p>
<p>TL;DR: this movie grinds my gears</p></pre>kung-fu_hippy: <pre><p>Yup. Say what you will about other bad comic book movies. For the most part, the characters were at least recognizable versions of their comic book selves. Catwoman is like someone read the name of the character and decided to write their own shitty story off of the name. Especially since it hadn't been that long since Michelle Pfeifer did such an excellent portrayal of her in the second Tim Burton Batman movie. </p></pre>brellowman2: <pre><p>When moisturiser is the big villain...</p></pre>SupaKoopa714: <pre><p>Nah, it should've been made. A good Catwoman movie would be pretty cool. They just fucked it up royally.</p></pre>CaspianX2: <pre><p>"Let's make a Catwoman movie, but make it have absolutely nothing to do with the character it's supposedly based on!"</p>
<p>Yeah, that movie should never get made. Either use the character whose name you're putting on the film, or just make it an original goddamn character.</p></pre>Niloc0905: <pre><p>The Percy Jackson movies. Not so much they shouldn't have been made, more so they should have been made correctly. </p>
<p>Edit: Oh shit, first gold! Thank you kind stranger.</p></pre>Rosssauced: <pre><p>We do owe a solid to it though for introducing Alexandra Dadario to the world.</p></pre>tacochublets: <pre><p>God bless</p></pre>LGMHorus: <pre><p>Athena bless</p></pre>Gskran: <pre><p>The only good thing about the movie in my opinion. She doesnt remotely resemble Annabeth from the books but i dont care. </p></pre>DaerkRoman: <pre><p>This deserves to be way higher up. I had such high hopes for the Percy Jackson movies, and it got completely ruined by the second one.</p>
<p>The first one wasn't that bad in my books, but only deviated from the plot a little bit. The second one, with the actor changes and overall mess just killed it.</p></pre>ShadowK2300: <pre><p>Only a little? It completely left out Kronos and Ares and made Hades the obvious bad guy! I'd say that's more than a little. Also the plot gets a whole Hollywood cliche makeover. I'm still angry about those movies.</p></pre>pielord13: <pre><p>Its bad when the author of the series publicly says do not watch this movie. </p></pre>Ryelen: <pre><p>Taken 2, and especially Taken 3.</p>
<p>Taken 1 was freaking awesome. But really you can't keep having members of this guys family getting kidnapped.</p></pre>MusicMadeInSilence: <pre><p>I'm waiting for Taken Tag Tournament.</p></pre>Nvdx9: <pre><p>The Jack and Jill movie </p></pre>picasso_penis: <pre><p>But how else will Adam Sandler get all his friends paid?</p></pre>Hermit35: <pre><p>Gus Van Sants scene by scene remake of Psycho. </p></pre>Downbound92: <pre><p>"I have an idea. Let's do an exact remake of Psycho, but in color and with less talented people". </p></pre>NeverEnoughMuppets: <pre><p>He did add that masturbation scene, and the hallucinations with the cows or whatever</p></pre>jtothewooo: <pre><p>Avatar the last airbender</p></pre>jva51: <pre><p>As stated in the brilliant Roger Ebert <a href="http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/the-last-airbender-2010">review</a> of this movie: </p>
<blockquote>
<p>"The Last Airbender" is an agonizing experience in every category I can think of and others still waiting to be invented. The laws of chance suggest that something should have gone right. Not here. It puts a nail in the coffin of low-rent 3D, but it will need a lot more coffins than that.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>After meticulously detailing the flaws, he wraps up the review with: </p>
<blockquote>
<p>I close with the hope that the title proves prophetic.</p>
</blockquote></pre>ReverendVerse: <pre><p>That's the one thing I miss about Roger Ebert, he was absolutely savage with movies he hated in the most eloquent way possible.</p></pre>OneTime_AtBandCamp: <pre><p>I imagine it's a little freeing for him to watch a movie like this from time to time. I mean usually he's trying to be fair, to justify criticism and balance things out. To put movies into their proper context. But if he watches a movie that's utter shit on every level in every possible context, well, then he's free. He can just focus on roasting them as hilariously as possible. It becomes a "fuck you" themed creative writing class.</p></pre>Schwertmeisterin: <pre><blockquote>
<p>The story takes place in the future, after Man has devastated the planet and survives in the form of beings with magical powers allowing them to influence earth, water and fire. </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Wait, was that a plot change made for this movie? I can't even remember.</p></pre>Autumn_Fire: <pre><p>It was M. Night Shamylan's fault. He was literally given a cake and told to put frosting on it and instead he just really replaced it with shit. It could've been good or at least passable but he's fucking incompetent as a director</p></pre>_Fuckleberry_Finn: <pre><p>It was just called "The Last Airbender". No Avatar. Avatar: The Last Airbender is the TV show.</p></pre>Benjo_Kazooie: <pre><p>There was no movie called 'The Last Airbender.' Only the animated series and comics. Although a movie would be interesting despite how hard it could be to fit an entire season of storylines into ~2 hours of runtime. Just as long as they get a director who understands the story and characters and doesn't make pointless changes to their designs or pronunciations of their names. M Knight Shyamalan would be a pretty terrible choice in particular.</p></pre>plastic_dinosaur: <pre><p>Been to Lake Logai lately?</p></pre>naderslovechild: <pre><p>There is no movie in Ba Sing Se</p></pre>madethisforoneremark: <pre><p>Highlander 2</p></pre>oberynMelonLord: <pre><p>how can there be more than one Highlander... movie?</p></pre>Nobody_epic: <pre><p>Synopsis here : </p>
<p>"Connor Macleod and Juan Sanchez Villa-Lobos Ramirez return in this all action sequel to 1985's Highlander. The year is 2024, and MacLeod is now a mortal old man. However the world has become a very dead planet since the creation of "the shield", an artifical ozone layer - which MacLeod supervised construction of. It turns out that MacLeod was banished from a distant past with his mentor Ramirez. MacLeod's old nemesis from the past (General Katana) travels into the future to kill Connor once an for all. MacLeod calls upon the spirit of Ramirez to help him defeat Katana, before Katana kills him. MacLeod is also aided by Louise Marcus, an environmental activist that believes the ozone layer as repaired itself and "the shield" is no longer necessary."</p>
<ul>
<li>CJ120UK</li>
</ul></pre>Hohohoju: <pre><p>It sounds like the screenwriters were playing a late night coke fuelled round of "yes, and"</p></pre>LootScootDootDoot: <pre><p>Yes, and... Highlanders are actually aliens.</p></pre>Hohohoju: <pre><p>Yes, and... We can shoehorn in a sex scene between Sean connery and Sigourney weaver!</p></pre>TheAdamantArchvile: <pre><p>There should have been only one. </p></pre>Mnyx: <pre><p>Highlander 2 is a very underrated shit movie. It's extremely shit.</p>
<p>Have you ever heard of Alan Smithee (anagram of The Alias Men)? Russel Malcahy was so disappointed by his own movie that he was pondering whether or not he should sign it with his own name. In the US the Director's Guild of America doesn't allow that a director uses another name than his own to sign his work, but in the case where the director feels screwed by the producers, he can exceptionally be allowed to change his name to Alan Smithee, the only other name available. This is such a shit movie this is an Alan Smithee worthy movie. </p>
<p>Beside the scenario which completely trumps over the first one, ignoring the one rule that made the movie: IMMORTAL DIE WHEN THEY HAVE THEIR HEAD CUT OFF, and all the incoherent things about the movies, in order to truly understand why that movie was a catastrophic failure, you have to watch "Highlander II seduced by Argentina" the making-of of the movie (which was shot in Argentina at the time). At first it seemed like a good idea to save money to shoot in South America but nobody could predict there would be an unprecedented banking crisis in Argentina while they were on site shooting the movie. An insurance firm got hold on the movie and they were eager for it to release, so they forced the director to rush it, and a very big number of scenes couldn't have been shot. Notably both the decors and the light had been thought of for a blue sky (which is the case in the Renegade version where the whole Zeist thing is cut). </p>
<p>Speaking of Zeist again, <a href="https://youtu.be/iv6_duBvfpA?t=7m4s">that scene</a> is a very testament to the behind the scenes chaos: the reason there are no lips moving is that they are telepaths (lol), but mostly because they were not sure what they would say, so they shot a scene, and then added the voices in post prod. The director had no idea where the movie was going. </p>
<p>Also lambert wouldn't participate in the movie without Sean Connery because he thought the script was shit, just thought I'd say that somewhere. Way to go Lambert, dragging Connery down with you. </p>
<p>The whole Zeist thing is completely retarded. </p>
<p>That scene only: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qmUrHr9UvMo">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qmUrHr9UvMo</a></p>
<p>Ramirez kills himself using the power of friendship so the two others can escape alive, with bagpipes music in the back.</p>
<ol>
<li><p>Why can Ramirez lift giant fans?</p></li>
<li><p>Why does he die even he still has his head?</p></li>
<li><p>Why does he have the power to open the door through thought.</p></li>
<li><p>Then why didn't he just opened the door telepathically if he could?</p></li>
<li><p>He had the time to leave the room with them, why the fuck didn't he?</p></li>
</ol>
<p>Surprisingly there are 2 endings to the movie, one on DVD and one on VHS (Europe notably) with additional scenes. There is a fairytale ending with transparent Lambert and the girl flying in the night air. It's a cherryshit on the shitcake.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NW1qHfhe_TM">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NW1qHfhe_TM</a></p></pre>frustratedpolarbear: <pre><p>Battlefield earth. </p></pre>jurassicbond: <pre><p>You're now being sued by the Church of Scientology.</p></pre>tehweave: <pre><p><em>dutch angle</em></p>
<p>WHILE YOU WERE STILL LEARNING HOW TO SPELL YOUR NAME</p></pre>Vraecla: <pre><p>I WAS CONQUERING GALAXIES!</p></pre>shack-32: <pre><p>Titanic 2</p></pre>Beecakeband: <pre><p>There's are second one? Why? The ship sank we know that what could happen in the sequel? </p></pre>mabel-but-slytherin: <pre><p>They built another ship. It also sank</p></pre>Beecakeband: <pre><p>Really? Legit? Oh man I just googled they actually did. What the hell?</p></pre>NeverEnoughMuppets: <pre><p>For anyone interested, there is also Thumbtanic. It's Titanic but everyone is a thumb.</p></pre>DammitPantera: <pre><p>The 1998 shot-by-shot remake of "Psycho". What was the point? The original was perfect!</p></pre>PonyGrove: <pre><p>I agree with you... however I would like to say that if I was a huge movie buff, an aspiring director, and had "F-you" money, I think it would be really <em>fun</em> to make that kind of movie. </p>
<p>That was not the case, per se, but what if the cast and crew just wanted to have a good time revolving around one of the best movies made?</p></pre>Noodle_Shop: <pre><p>I imagine taking movies, even with the script, then remaking it would be insanely fun. Especially if you change small things here or there. </p>
<p>An all lesbian remake of The Outsiders</p>
<p>Star Trek II but using actors from Star Wars</p>
<p>Gone with the Wind, but now with an alien invasion in the background.</p></pre>GeneralTonic: <pre><blockquote>
<p>Star Trek II but using actors from Star Wars</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I just had a vision of the kind of thing that's gonna piss me off in 30 years . . .</p></pre>VictorBlimpmuscle: <pre><p>Every <em>Jaws</em> sequel</p></pre>DavosLostFingers: <pre><p>But then we wouldn't have gotten to hear a shark roar! </p></pre>Nobody_epic: <pre><p>When someone asked michael Caine if he had seen jaws 4 (the one he was in?) He said no but I have seen the house that it built. </p></pre>IamChantus: <pre><p>Wasn't the tagline for that one "This time it's personal"?</p>
<p>Like, how in the fuck is a shark tracking these assholes?</p></pre>NeverEnoughMuppets: <pre><p>That was my favorite part, the shark was a vicious serial killer on a decades long quest for vengeance</p></pre>IamChantus: <pre><p>Bu......But it's not even the same shark.</p></pre>NeverEnoughMuppets: <pre><p>Take it up with the writers</p></pre>cyrashan: <pre><p>Everyone is just posting shitty movies. Yeah, bad movies are bad. Not the point of this thread.</p>
<p>For me, the answer is the new Karate Kid movie. Not because it was particularly bad (it wasn't good either). But the original Karate Kid is still a modern story that didn't need to be remade for any reason. You should only remake a movie when the source material just isn't relatable to a modern audience and the original message can't be conveyed as effectively. </p></pre>markercore: <pre><p>Plus it should have been the kung fu kid because Jackie Chan was the sensei...</p></pre>1000littleaccidents: <pre><p>*sifu</p>
<p>But yeah, Kung Fu Kid would have been a perfectly fine title too, just felt silly that they insisted on keeping the title to cash in on the original.</p></pre>icepick314: <pre><p>why call it "Karate Kid" when it was wushu (kung fu)?</p></pre>AlanJohn: <pre><p>Because in the sequel where Jaden gets beat up by some MMA meatheads Jackie Chan will have to teach him a new fighting technique so he could stand a chance - Karate. The movie will be called accordingly, Kung Fu Kid. </p></pre>NeoDuckLord: <pre><p>A good day to Die Hard. Just so shit.</p></pre>namdor: <pre><p>That third Hobbit movie. There is no way that book deserves to be mangled into a trilogy of films. </p>
<p>This isn't to say that I liked any of them, but just that there was no reason to force it to become more than one or two movies.</p></pre>Semicolon7645: <pre><p>Watch "The Hobbit: The Tolken Edit". It's a ~4.5 hour recut of all three movies, and it follows the book much closer.</p></pre>SpyGlassez: <pre><p>Does it do away with the useless romance?</p></pre>Exctmonk: <pre><p>The version I saw (There and Back Again) did an excellent job of excising it. I think a lot of the dwarf's anguish at the end was replaced at either Bilbo being danger or...his brother? Anyway, editing magic.</p></pre>mrjinpengyou: <pre><p>It cuts the whole "pale orc" story and the meeting with Elrond and Saruman. They removed the romance with the new elf girl and kept it as close as possible to the book. </p>
<p>Edit: <a href="https://tolkieneditor.wordpress.com/">for people interested</a></p>
<p>List of things that were edited:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>The investigation of Dol Guldor</strong> has been completely excised, including the appearances of Radagast, Saruman and Galadriel. </li>
<li><strong>The Tauriel-Legolas-Kili love triangle</strong> has also been removed. </li>
<li><strong>The Pale Orc subplot</strong> is vastly trimmed down. </li>
<li><strong>Several of the Laketown scenes</strong> have been cut, such as Bard’s imprisonment and the superfluous orc raid. </li>
<li><strong>The prelude with old Bilbo</strong> is gone.</li>
</ul></pre>ManicLord: <pre><p>They also remove Legolas almost completely. </p></pre>Dragonbahn: <pre><p>Yes. Gone. The female elf is completely removed from the story even.</p></pre>knight_ofdoriath: <pre><p>I liked the movies but I agree with you. It definitely should've been a two part series. There's only so much they could add to the source material before it turns into fanfiction. They couldn't even use information from the Unfinished Tales or the Silmarillion which would've added a little more depth. </p></pre>VeronicaNew: <pre><p>"Mac and Me", an awful, low rent version of "ET". </p>
<p>But made all the more hilarious by Paul Rudd
<a href="https://youtu.be/6bNzAgJMYVE">https://youtu.be/6bNzAgJMYVE</a></p></pre>thutruthissomewhere: <pre><p>I absolutely love when Paul Rudd does that. </p></pre>the_real_farfetchd: <pre><p>Cool cat saves the kids</p></pre>Nadocomedy: <pre><p><strong>"THAT KID KICKED SAND IN COOL CAT'S FACE!"</strong> </p></pre>red_rob5: <pre><p>"There he is!"</p></pre>stumper93: <pre><p>Oooooooh my god because of the YMS review, I shelled out 10 bucks to buy this. </p>
<p>It was an experience I'll never forget sitting through.</p></pre>Djibrail: <pre><p>Eragon..</p></pre>eruwaedhiel8: <pre><p>This is what I was looking for. If you're going to make a movie that has just about nothing in common with its source material, why even bother giving it the same name?</p></pre>vipros42: <pre><p>it should have been made, just made a lot better. That said, the source material is tremendously derivative and amateurish. Entertaining, but exactly what you would expect from a 17 year old (or however old he was)</p></pre>FourArmz: <pre><p>Exactly, it's written like a 17 year old what write it but some of the issues could be worked out in a movie version. Or you know we could have an ok cgi dragon and fuck up everything else beyond belief.</p></pre>Captain_Kuhl: <pre><p>The dragon was less than okay. The dragon in the books was explicitly stated to not have feathery wings, yet they gave it feathers anyways, then said "well, it never said there weren't feathers in the book." Fuck that design. </p></pre>FourArmz: <pre><p>I meant in pure visual appearance it was ok. Of course they don't respect the source material.</p></pre>Artiemes: <pre><p>Powercreep was real by the end of the series.</p>
<p>Still loved it. Paolini, for his age, did something not many people could do.</p></pre>sammythejammy: <pre><p>They skipped so much shit it made a continuation into the next books impossible.</p></pre>Elcatro: <pre><p>The Golden Compass.</p>
<p>Those books deserve a good adaptation.</p></pre>Mortalwombat_uk_: <pre><p>Apparently the BBC are doing a series based on it. Should be better than the movie at least. </p></pre>RQK1996: <pre><p>the actors were good though, heck even the girl was great</p></pre>yeaheyeah: <pre><p>The polar bear gave a stellar performance. </p></pre>Snrub1: <pre><p>Any Terminator movie after Terminator 2. Terminator 2 wrapped up the story quite nicely and further sequels were not needed.</p></pre>Skyhooks: <pre><p>The Sarah Connor Chronicles is awesome though, right up until the cancelled it on a cliffhanger.</p></pre>GregoleX2: <pre><p>Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull</p></pre>MajorBallsup: <pre><p>What's that? There was only three Indiana Jones films. I've never even heard of that one. There are three. </p></pre>qngff: <pre><p>The Tale of Despereaux. </p>
<p>I read the book in fifth grade. It's a really well written children's novel and has a lot of meaning behind it. When they made the movie they fucked everything up, it lost so much charm, and I didn't see anything good about it even then. (The movie came out around the same time). The perspective shifts throughout the book were poorly translated into film. It was all around terrible. </p></pre>Mikester245: <pre><p>Oh..I liked that movie :(</p></pre>Nocturnal365: <pre><p>Grease 2. Unnecessary sequels are the worst!</p></pre>JustCreepyEnough: <pre><p>Cars 2 and 3</p>
<p>And even Planes. They had the Incredibles and they chose to make sequels for Cars, instead</p></pre>Mal-Capone: <pre><p>Makes sense from a business standpoint though. Cars was a movie that was aimed at a younger audience, therefore merch will go faster, plus the IP was just a goldmine for shitty and non-shitty toys.</p></pre>markercore: <pre><p>Incredibles sequel is coming though?</p></pre>lolzidop: <pre><p>To be fair Cars 3 looks like it's going to be top, they seem to have learnt from the mistakes of Cars 2</p></pre>lizardking99: <pre><p>Definitely got to be Dragonball Evolution. I've never seen another adaptation shit so much on the source material.</p>
<p>Having said that, seeing Justin Chatwin as The Ghost in Doctor Who was actually pretty cool.</p>
<p>edit: <a href="/u/xolotl123">u/xolotl123</a> was right. Chatwin was the Ghost. Point is he's not terrible at portraying heroes</p></pre>earthlings_all: <pre><p>The new Dirty Dancing. What a waste of money and resources. Why did they feel the need to remake perfection?</p></pre>death_ship: <pre><p>live action anime films</p></pre>icepick314: <pre><p>how about all those Japanese versions like Rurouni Kenshin and Attack on Titans?</p>
<p>I liked the retake on Rurouni Kenshin and nailed all the vives of the characters on screen...</p>
<p>I have yet to watch Attack on Titan but I hear that was okay at best...</p></pre>
