用最小的内存发送大文件 翻译+分析

wwq1988 · · 777 次点击 · · 开始浏览    
这是一个创建于 的文章,其中的信息可能已经有所发展或是发生改变。

原文:

https://medium.com/@owlwalks/sending-big-file-with-minimal-memory-in-golang-8f3fc280d2c

一般我们发送文件


    buf := new(bytes.Buffer)

    writer := multipart.NewWriter(buf)

    defer writer.Close()

    part, err := writer.CreateFormFile("myFile", "foo.txt")

    if err != nil {

    return err

    }

    file, err := os.Open(name)

    if err != nil {

    return err

    }

    defer file.Close()

    if _, err = io.Copy(part, file); err != nil {

    return err

    }

    http.Post(url, writer.FormDataContentType(), buf)

这样buf会读取文件的所有内容,加入文件非常大,内存占用就会比较大

优化方法

r, w := io.Pipe()
m := multipart.NewWriter(w)
go func() {
    defer w.Close()
    defer m.Close()
    part, err := m.CreateFormFile("myFile", "foo.txt")
    if err != nil {
        return
    }
    file, err := os.Open(name)
    if err != nil {
        return
    }
    defer file.Close()
    if _, err = io.Copy(part, file); err != nil {
        return
    }
}()
http.Post(url, m.FormDataContentType(), r)

上述是代码是从原处拷贝,下面分析下原因

net/http 中

func Post(url, contentType string, body io.Reader) (resp *Response, err error) {
]   return DefaultClient.Post(url, contentType, body)
]}

func (c *Client) Post(url, contentType string, body io.Reader) (resp *Response, err error) {
     req, err := NewRequest("POST", url, body)
     if err != nil {
         return nil, err
     }
     req.Header.Set("Content-Type", contentType)
     return c.Do(req)
 }

func NewRequest(method, url string, body io.Reader) (*Request, error) {
...
   if body != nil {
       switch v := body.(type) {
       case *bytes.Buffer:
           req.ContentLength = int64(v.Len())
           buf := v.Bytes()
           req.GetBody = func() (io.ReadCloser, error) {
               r := bytes.NewReader(buf)
               return ioutil.NopCloser(r), nil
           }
       case *bytes.Reader:
           req.ContentLength = int64(v.Len())
           snapshot := *v
           req.GetBody = func() (io.ReadCloser, error) {
               r := snapshot
               return ioutil.NopCloser(&r), nil
           }
       case *strings.Reader:
           req.ContentLength = int64(v.Len())
           snapshot := *v
           req.GetBody = func() (io.ReadCloser, error) {
               r := snapshot
               return ioutil.NopCloser(&r), nil
           }
       default:
           // This is where we'd set it to -1 (at least
           // if body != NoBody) to mean unknown, but
           // that broke people during the Go 1.8 testing
           // period. People depend on it being 0 I
           // guess. Maybe retry later. See Issue 18117.
       }
...
}

os中

func Pipe() (r *File, w *File, err error) {
    var p [2]int

    e := syscall.Pipe2(p[0:], syscall.O_CLOEXEC)
    // pipe2 was added in 2.6.27 and our minimum requirement is 2.6.23, so it
    // might not be implemented.
    if e == syscall.ENOSYS {
        // See ../syscall/exec.go for description of lock.
        syscall.ForkLock.RLock()
        e = syscall.Pipe(p[0:])
        if e != nil {
            syscall.ForkLock.RUnlock()
            return nil, nil, NewSyscallError("pipe", e)
        }
        syscall.CloseOnExec(p[0])
        syscall.CloseOnExec(p[1])
        syscall.ForkLock.RUnlock()
    } else if e != nil {
        return nil, nil, NewSyscallError("pipe2", e)
    }

    return newFile(uintptr(p[0]), "|0", kindPipe), newFile(uintptr(p[1]), "|1", kindPipe), nil
}

可见Pipe返回的类型在body的类型判断中进入了default的逻辑,而追溯post的方法会在此处写

func (t *transferWriter) writeBody(w io.Writer) error {
...
    if t.Body != nil {
         var body = transferBodyReader{t}
         if chunked(t.TransferEncoding) {
             if bw, ok := w.(*bufio.Writer); ok && !t.IsResponse {
                 w = &internal.FlushAfterChunkWriter{Writer: bw}
             }
             cw := internal.NewChunkedWriter(w)
             _, err = io.Copy(cw, body)
             if err == nil {
                 err = cw.Close()
             }
         } else if t.ContentLength == -1 {
             ncopy, err = io.Copy(w, body)
         } else {
             ncopy, err = io.Copy(w, io.LimitReader(body, t.ContentLength))
             if err != nil {
                 return err
             }
             var nextra int64
             nextra, err = io.Copy(ioutil.Discard, body)
             ncopy += nextra
         }
...
}

由于body不为nil,而且contentlength为0,所以进入了else的逻辑,也就形成了流式读取和流式写入,在大文件时候可以节省内存


有疑问加站长微信联系(非本文作者)

本文来自:简书

感谢作者:wwq1988

查看原文:用最小的内存发送大文件 翻译+分析

入群交流(和以上内容无关):加入Go大咖交流群,或添加微信:liuxiaoyan-s 备注:入群;或加QQ群:692541889

777 次点击  
加入收藏 微博
暂无回复
添加一条新回复 (您需要 登录 后才能回复 没有账号 ?)
  • 请尽量让自己的回复能够对别人有帮助
  • 支持 Markdown 格式, **粗体**、~~删除线~~、`单行代码`
  • 支持 @ 本站用户;支持表情(输入 : 提示),见 Emoji cheat sheet
  • 图片支持拖拽、截图粘贴等方式上传