Docker Swarm代码分析笔记（17）——event_monitor.go

Engine结构体有一个eventsMonitor成员：

type Engine struct {
    ......
    eventsMonitor   *EventsMonitor
}

EventsMonitor结构体定义如下：

//EventsMonitor monitors events
type EventsMonitor struct {
    stopChan chan struct{}
    cli      client.APIClient
    handler  func(msg events.Message) error
}

stopChan用来通知停止接受消息；cli是底层连接的client，而handler则是收到event的处理函数。

Engine.ConnectWithClient方法会给eventsMonitor成员赋值：

// ConnectWithClient is exported
func (e *Engine) ConnectWithClient(client dockerclient.Client, apiClient engineapi.APIClient) error {
    e.client = client
    e.apiClient = apiClient
    e.eventsMonitor = NewEventsMonitor(e.apiClient, e.handler)

    // Fetch the engine labels.
    if err := e.updateSpecs(); err != nil {
        return err
    }

    e.StartMonitorEvents()

    // Force a state update before returning.
    if err := e.RefreshContainers(true); err != nil {
        return err
    }

    if err := e.RefreshImages(); err != nil {
        return err
    }

    // Do not check error as older daemon does't support this call.
    e.RefreshVolumes()
    e.RefreshNetworks()

    e.emitEvent("engine_connect")

    return nil
}

其中Engine.StartMonitorEvents代码如下：

// StartMonitorEvents monitors events from the engine
func (e *Engine) StartMonitorEvents() {
    log.WithFields(log.Fields{"name": e.Name, "id": e.ID}).Debug("Start monitoring events")
    ec := make(chan error)
    e.eventsMonitor.Start(ec)

    go func() {
        if err := <-ec; err != nil {
            if !strings.Contains(err.Error(), "EOF") {
                // failing node reconnect should use back-off strategy
                <-e.refreshDelayer.Wait(e.getFailureCount())
            }
            e.StartMonitorEvents()
        }
        close(ec)
    }()
}

Engine.StartMonitorEvents就是如果从ec channel收取消息，如果是错误，就不断地循环启动Engine.StartMonitorEvents。

EventsMonitor.Start函数代码如下：

// Start starts the EventsMonitor
func (em *EventsMonitor) Start(ec chan error) {
    em.stopChan = make(chan struct{})

    responseBody, err := em.cli.Events(context.Background(), types.EventsOptions{})
    if err != nil {
        ec <- err
        return
    }

    resultChan := make(chan decodingResult)

    go func() {
        dec := json.NewDecoder(responseBody)
        for {
            var result decodingResult
            result.err = dec.Decode(&result.msg)
            resultChan <- result
            if result.err == io.EOF {
                break
            }
        }
        close(resultChan)
    }()

    go func() {
        defer responseBody.Close()
        for {
            select {
            case <-em.stopChan:
                ec <- nil
                return
            case result := <-resultChan:
                if result.err != nil {
                    ec <- result.err
                    return
                }
                if err := em.handler(result.msg); err != nil {
                    ec <- err
                    return
                }
            }
        }
    }()
}

代码逻辑实际就是发出“HTTP GET /events”请求，然后等待Docker Engine的响应。因为这个HTTP请求很可能会阻塞在这里，因此随后的HTTP消息交互就会重新建立一个HTTP连接。原理在这里：

type Response struct {
    ......

    // Body represents the response body.
    //
    // The http Client and Transport guarantee that Body is always
    // non-nil, even on responses without a body or responses with
    // a zero-length body. It is the caller's responsibility to
    // close Body. The default HTTP client's Transport does not
    // attempt to reuse HTTP/1.0 or HTTP/1.1 TCP connections
    // ("keep-alive") unless the Body is read to completion and is
    // closed.
    //
    // The Body is automatically dechunked if the server replied
    // with a "chunked" Transfer-Encoding.
    Body io.ReadCloser

    ......
}

如果想停止这个EventsMonitor，可以使用Engine.Stop方法：

// Stop stops the EventsMonitor
func (em *EventsMonitor) Stop() {
    if em.stopChan == nil {
        return
    }
    close(em.stopChan)
}

有疑问加站长微信联系（非本文作者）